This Dr. Harry Harlow was not just unsympathetic, but a monster just like the unethical doctors who forcefully remove children from loving mothers by claiming parental alienation to give them to their abusers. Why do they do this? Because they get paid by the abuser to do this! It’s a fraud on the courts that needs to end!
From the Top Ten Unethical Psychological Experiments
The Well of Despair 1960Dr. Harry Harlow was an unsympathetic person, using terms like the rape rack and iron maiden in his experiments. He is most well-known for the experiments he conducted on rhesus monkeys concerning social isolation. Dr. Harlow took infant rhesus monkeys who had already bonded with their mothers and placed them in a stainless steel vertical chamber device alone with no contact in order to sever those bonds. They were kept in the chambers for up to one year. Many of these monkeys came out of the chamber psychotic, and many did not recover. Dr. Harlow concluded that even a happy, normal childhood was no defense against depression, while science writer Deborah Blum called these, common sense results.
Gene Sackett of the University of Washington in Seattle, one of Harlows doctoral students, stated he believes the animal liberation movement in the U.S. was born as a result of Harlows experiments. William Mason, one of Harlows students, said that Harlow kept this going to the point where it was clear to many people that the work was really violating ordinary sensibilities, that anybody with respect for life or people would find this offensive. Its as if he sat down and said, Im only going to be around another ten years. What Id like to do, then, is leave a great big mess behind. If that was his aim, he did a perfect job.
Any doctor removing a child from their mother using the fraudulent theory of parental alienation or other phony psychobabble BS needs to be exposed for the monsters they are. They come up with phony rhetoric and say it in a convincing manner, much like they did back in Salem when they accused women of witchcraft.
This Parental Alienation Custody Change Fraud is going to go down in history as one of the most unethical psychological social engineering experiments of all time. The scandal is on the same level as the cover up of sexual abuse by the Catholic Church. It’s time people start to wake up and recognize that these doctors are covering up for all types of domestic abuse against women and children for PROFIT.
If you click on the links regarding Dr. Harry Harlow, you will find out that he received awards from psychological associations. Maybe this will start to get people thinking that there are groups of people doing unethical experiments and they do support each other on their theories and cover up for each other. The APA also published the Rind Study which tried to justify child sexual abuse as being acceptable and not that harmful to children. There is a common thread between all of these sick studies that push quack theories to justify unacceptable behavior. Only with Parental Alienation Theory, the whole idea is to call the victims liars which re-victimizes them. All that is needed to do this is to pay an unethical doctor to testify who will ignore real evidence and substitute in their fraudulent rhetoric.
When people realized the horrible treatment of animals that Harlow inflicted, the result was an animal liberation movement. What needs to happen as a result of these unethical parental alienation scams is for children to have a liberation movement and demand to have rights to be heard and to make their own decisions.
And Intentionally Scaring Monkeys
February 11, 2009 at 11:00 pm
[...] for themselves. It is reminiscent of one of the worst psychological experiments ever conducted by Dr. Harry Harlow, who removed rhesus monkeys who had already bonded with their mothers and placed them in a [...]
February 12, 2009 at 5:15 am
A mother’s journey for justice
Part 1
By BRANDON A. PERRY
Published: Thursday, February 5, 2009 4:09 PM CST
Following a recent hearing inside a Marion County paternity court,
Tracie Nelson learned that things would not change anytime soon: Her
daughter still won’t be coming home.
While leaving the court chamber with her attorney, Nelson appears
frustrated and sad.
“I’m so tired, I don’t know what else to do,” Nelson says with tears
in her eyes as she is embraced by her mother, Minnie Blaylock.
Nelson has learned that an ex-boyfriend will retain custody of her
seven-year-old daughter, Kay. An ugly custody battle involving
allegations of molestation and mental illness continues.
However, as the two discuss the case with attorney Dana Childress-
Jones, Nelson recovers her strength, recognizing that she can’t give
up even if the odds seemed stacked against her.
“If I do not fight for Kay, who will?” said Nelson.
The challenge
When most Americans find themselves involved in the court system,
they expect justice to be administered based on the law and
compassion.
Nelson, however, says she and Kay have not received anything
resembling justice.
According to Nelson, biased judges and attorneys have refused to
remove Kay from the father’s home, despite serious allegations of
abuse in that household. Nelson, who raised Kay for the first six
years of her life, believes custody should be returned to her or to
Blaylock, Kay’s maternal grandmother.
“Right now all we’re asking is for someone to stand up and do what’s
in the best interest of Kay,” said Blaylock. “She’s a wonderful
child, and deserves to be in an environment where she is safe and
cared for with love.”
Nelson wants to share Kay’s case with the community because, she
stated, she’s not only fighting for her daughter, but hopes to
provide a testimony to help parents who find themselves in similar
situations.
The beginning
In May, 2001, Kay was born to Tracie Nelson and ex-boyfriend Billy
Dupree (Dupree refused to speak with the Recorder regarding the
case). From Kay’s birth Nelson had sole legal custody of her.
Although the relationship between Nelson and Dupree ended, Nelson
said she understood the importance of a father’s presence in a
child’s life and encouraged Dupree to visit Kay.
In September 2004, Kay began exhibiting unexplained sexual behavior,
which a nurse at Community North Hospital later stated was very
unusual for a girl her age. This puzzled Nelson because she knew her
daughter had no reason to be with any man other than her father, who
occasionally had Kay at his home for overnight visitations.
In written documents submitted in court, Nelson said Dupree “was very
guarded when I spoke with him about these concerns, and told me if I
kept looking I would find what I was `looking for.’”
Family members wanted Nelson to contact child authorities immediately
to investigate Dupree, but Nelson said she urged caution, wanting to
give Dupree a chance to defend himself and help in discovering if
anyone did molest Kay.
Nelson took Kay to a therapist, and expressed her concerns to
paternity court Judge Alicia Gooden, who suspended Dupree’s overnight
visitations. Then, for the first time, Dupree expressed an interest
in having custody of Kay.
According to Nelson, Kay later told a forensic investigator, child
psychologist and police detective that Dupree had touched her
inappropriately, and that Dupree’s stepson had been “playing house”
on her.
An employee for the Marion County Prosecutor’s office, who has to
remain anonymous, believes Kay’s story is legitimate, but could not
take action due to the custody dispute.
In August 2007, following a hearing, Gooden granted custody of Kay to
Dupree.
The railroad
Nelson believes Gooden’s decision was based on a conflict of interest.
She said Kim Bacon, Dupree’s attorney, was given preferential
treatment during the hearing because she is a pro temp judge in
Gooden’s paternity court. She also claims that Bacon’s boyfriend is
Dupree’s best friend. Nelson says she has been a target ever since
she filed a complaint against Bacon with the Indiana Bar Association.
“The judge’s decision was based, not on the best interest of Kay, but
on Gooden’s bias against me and her relationship with Bacon,” said
Nelson.
Bacon and Dupree have declined to talk publicly. When contacted by
the Recorder to get Dupree’s version of events, Bacon firmly ruled
out a discussion about the case.
“What we’re seeing right now is a situation where the private
business of a seven-year-old girl is being dragged out into the
public, and that’s not right,” Bacon said. “Neither my client nor I
will be a part of that. We decline to comment.”
According to court records, Dupree has strongly denied any
allegations of abuse, and he and Bacon assert that Nelson is mentally
and financially unstable. They also believe that Nelson has coached
Kay into saying certain things to bolster her case.
Nelson’s attorney, Childress-Jones, requested a change of judge, and
Kay’s case was passed to Judge Gary Miller. Nelson alleges that
Miller appeared to be fair at first, but after speaking with Gooden
and Bacon, has refused to grant even temporary custody to Nelson,
despite the investigation into alleged abuse.
To date, Nelson has only occasional supervised visits with Kay that
she must pay for, and Kay is not allowed to keep gifts or other items.
Nelson says she has had several attorneys helping her, simply because
they get hopeless after a short time working on her case. Shortly
after Nelson lost custody of Kay, one former attorney, Dylan Vigh,
stated on WTLC-AM (1310) “Afternoons with Amos” show that her case
was “by far” one of the “greatest injustices” he has ever seen, and
that Nelson has been “railroaded” in the courtroom.
Still, Nelson says she is not surrendering the fight to get Kay back
home. She is seeking to move her case to the court of a third judge
with no connections to Gooden. She is also seeking removal of the
Guardian Ad Litem (GAL), a representative appointed to serve as a
nonbiased guardian of a child in a custody dispute. Nelson says the
GAL has not acted in Kay’s best interest.
“I have a divine right, as Kay’s mother, to protect her,” Nelson
said. “All I’m trying to do is get her life back to normal and keep
her safe.”
Coming in Part 2: A closer look into the case.
Note: Kay is not the child’s
http://indianapolis recorder. com/articles/ 2009/02/06/ news/local/ news02.
txt
I thought you might be interested in this.
February 17, 2009 at 8:21 am
[...] professionals. The mother is vilified, while the father is idealized, and another child suffers a MOTHERLESS [...]
February 20, 2009 at 7:31 pm
[...] cause depression and psychosis. In one of the most unethical experiments of all time conducted by Dr. Harry Harlowe, baby monkeys had the bonds with their mothers intentionally severed. The monkeys became psychotic, [...]
February 22, 2009 at 4:56 am
[...] with alarming frequency due to the unethical treatment of women and children in family court. Maternal Deprivation is inflicting abuse by severing the mother-child bond. It is a form of abuse that men inflict on both the mother and children, especially men who claim [...]
February 24, 2009 at 12:23 am
[...] Courtroom Where “Money Talks, Bullshit Walks” Beheading Getting Attention For the Wrong ReasonsDoctor Who Intentionally Severs Bonds With Mothers Is a MonsterAustralia: Dad Throws Daughter, Darcey Freeman, Off BridgeJustice Committee criticises Fathers for [...]
March 1, 2009 at 1:11 am
[...] with a large source of information coming from Bowlby, based on Spitz and Goldfarb, and also from unethical animal experimentation. Overwhelmingly, research shows that severing this natural bond between a mother and child causes [...]
March 2, 2009 at 12:35 am
[...] with alarming frequency due to the unethical treatment of women and children in family court. Maternal Deprivation is inflicting abuse by severing the mother-child bond. It is a form of abuse that men inflict on both the mother and children, especially men who claim [...]
March 8, 2009 at 9:24 pm
[...] Daughter, Darcey Freeman, Off BridgeCanadian Children Taken Captive in Parental Alienation Scam CaseDoctor Who Intentionally Severs Bonds With Mothers Is a MonsterOutrage: Wife Beheaded for Asking for a DivorceHaleigh Cummings Update-TN Lead & Questionable [...]
March 11, 2009 at 12:55 am
[...] Top Posts Cook County Illinois Custody Change FraudUK:Harriet Harman’s committee position conflicts with CSA, pro-pedophilia, incest, kiddie-porn promotion Florida Mom Loses Custody Battle-Now May Never See Daughter AgainHaleigh Cummings Update-TN Lead & Questionable StoryShep Smith Interviews Haleigh Cummings’ Mother & GrandmotherCanadian Children Taken Captive in Parental Alienation Scam CaseHaleigh Cummings’ Dad: I ‘Never’ Hit My ChildOutrage: Wife Beheaded for Asking for a DivorceChild in imminent fear shoots father – vindicated in appeal – PAS fraud nightmarePriscila Amador Told Classmates of Sexual Abuse Before Murder-Suicide by FatherCanadian Symposium on PAS teaching how to do custody change scamDoctor Who Intentionally Severs Bonds With Mothers Is a Monster [...]
April 12, 2009 at 12:52 pm
[...] with a large source of information coming from Bowlby, based on Spitz and Goldfarb, and also from unethical animal experimentation. Overwhelmingly, research shows that severing this natural bond between a mother and child causes [...]
April 23, 2009 at 5:18 am
[...] with alarming frequency due to the unethical treatment of women and children in family court. Maternal Deprivation is inflicting abuse by severing the mother-child bond. It is a form of abuse that men inflict on both the mother and children, especially men who claim [...]
July 5, 2009 at 12:05 pm
[...] Deprivation was inflicted on monkeys by Harry Harlow with terrible consequences. Now this abuse is spreading to humans promulgated by unethical [...]
July 15, 2009 at 12:07 am
[...] Deprivation was inflicted on monkeys by Harry Harlow with terrible consequences. Now this abuse is spreading to humans promulgated by unethical [...]